Why this ad?
Skip navigation

no spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Skip navigation
Goal: 15,000 Progress: 2,807
Sponsored by: The Rainforest Site

Greenwashing — deceptively promoting one's organization's policies as eco-friendly — isn't something only big oil does anymore. Some of America's airlines are jumping on the greenwashing bandwagon. But they're not fooling us.

The European Union has set standards to limit global warming pollution by airlines, requiring them to pay a tax if they exceed the limitations. But the United States, along with other countries and many airlines are opposing the law. Several of the opposing airlines have consistently touted their respective commitment to keeping the environment clean.

If these airlines were so committed to environmental conservation, they shouldn't be trying to block clean air standards every step of the way. The same goes for the United States. If airlines don't want to pay the fine, they should find better ways to limit their emissions.

Write to President Obama asking he support the EU's emission standards.

Sign Here






Dear President Obama,

I was saddened to learn about your opposition to legislation set by the European Union that would help to limit carbon emissions from airplanes. I was also disappointed to find out many airlines oppose the new regulations as well.

You see, we as a country — as well as airlines like United and America — claim to be at the forefront of environmental preservation. But when we oppose a potentially groundbreaking law such as the one the EU has put forth, we look like hypocrites. On one hand, we promote our own commitment to environmental stewardship. On the other hand, we scoff when an outside party tells us what to do, even if it may be beneficial to the environment.

I don't understand this logic. And I would like to see us keep our commitment to conservation.

Our primary concern needs to be for the health of our planet, not profit.

Thank you for your time.

Petition Signatures


May 14, 2013 Katia Samuelson
May 14, 2013 Linda McEachron Taylor
May 14, 2013 (Name not displayed)
May 14, 2013 janeann hewling come on guys!
May 13, 2013 Jessica Pynn
May 13, 2013 (Name not displayed)
May 13, 2013 Rosemary Webber
May 13, 2013 Erandy Ramirez
May 13, 2013 Rachael Pappano
May 13, 2013 Alexander Kovesy
May 12, 2013 ray Legault
May 12, 2013 Mary Thomas
May 12, 2013 Karen Hamilton
May 12, 2013 Jane Crick
May 12, 2013 Marianne Good
May 11, 2013 jess bannester
May 11, 2013 Martina Salobir
May 11, 2013 Jacqueline Pavan
May 10, 2013 Sigfrido Quijano
May 10, 2013 Robert Sanders
May 10, 2013 Lisa Emeott
May 10, 2013 Karin Rautio
May 10, 2013 David McGlocklin
May 10, 2013 Susan Mitchell
May 10, 2013 Denise Schmidt
May 9, 2013 N. M.
May 8, 2013 janet russo
May 8, 2013 Breanna Newhart
May 5, 2013 D. Singer
May 4, 2013 Roy Buchanan
May 4, 2013 (Name not displayed) Whatever we say, our primary concern is money. This should not be so. By becoming the forefront in clean energy we could make a huge profit, but this would require change, which is something we seem unwilling to do. Money is therefore our only motivation.
May 3, 2013 Diana McBride
May 2, 2013 Catharine McEachern
May 2, 2013 (Name not displayed)
May 2, 2013 Fiona Glass W
May 2, 2013 Kathleen Martin
May 1, 2013 Dennis Schaef
May 1, 2013 Bernard Johnson
Apr 30, 2013 Lisa Wilsher
Apr 30, 2013 Edward Carey
Apr 30, 2013 (Name not displayed)
Apr 30, 2013 (Name not displayed)
Apr 30, 2013 ana obrist
Apr 30, 2013 Annette Waddington
Apr 30, 2013 Harriet Shamblin
Apr 30, 2013 jerry severino
Apr 30, 2013 Chris Leehey
Apr 29, 2013 Misty Breaux
Apr 29, 2013 Dorothy Davies
Apr 29, 2013 Becky Anderson

back to top